Methodology | Results |
This page describes a preliminary quick comparison of the Rossby radii of deformation in a few vertical layers produced by a data-driven primitive equation simulation of the AOSN-II experiment.
A simple formula for the Rossby radius of deformation is chosen1, namely LD = f-1 Ñ D, where:
∫ | ztop | ||
LD = f-1 | N dz | ||
zbot |
When implementing these methods:
Animations may be slow to load | |||||
Layers | Ñ=Nmean | Ñ=Nrms | |||
0-5 m | Mixed Layer | [0-1.6] (km) | Animation | [0-1.6] (km) | Animation |
5-60 m | Thermocline | [4.6-13.0] (km) | Animation | [4.9-13.4] (km) | Animation |
60-300 m | Under Current | [12.2-21.9] (km) | Animation | [12.5-23.7] (km) | Animation |
Results computed on terrain-following grid | |||||
0-5 m | Mixed Layer | [0-1.5] (km) | Animation | [0-1.6] (km) | Animation |
5-60 m | Thermocline | [3.4-14.0] (km) | Animation | [4.2-13.8] (km) | Animation |
60-300 m | Under Current | [5.1-23.8] (km) | Animation | [7.7-26.1] (km) | Animation |
To the right is a table indicating exactly which layers were selected, the observed ranges of Rossby radii (outliers removed) and links to the corresponding animations of the Rossby radii. One quick observation, the mixed layer Rossby radii are dominated by the diurnal heating. The radii increase in the local afternoon3 as the heating sets up a surface temperature gradient. This sensitivity coupled with the small surface radii suggest that the mixed-layer Rossby radii may not be well defined. In fact, an on-going issue is the examination of the choice of depth ranges as well as the decision to use constant depth ranges rather than ranges that depend on the local hydrography.
1This formula was obtained from:
Pedlosky, J. (1987) "Geophysical Fluid Dynamics".
Springer-Verlag. New York. 710pp
An alternative methodology, based on finding the first eigenvalue
of a Sturm-Liouville problem, is described
here.
2It might be instructive to simply not calculate the Rossby radius in regions with instabilities.